In a recent discussion paper, the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (IBBI) proposed that instead of having separate valuation reports for different types of assets, a registered valuer should submit a comprehensive valuation report for the entire corporate debtor. For companies with assets worth up to Rs 1,000 crore and for micro, small, and medium enterprises (MSMEs), the IBBI suggests appointing only one registered valuer to determine both the fair value and liquidation value.The IBBI stated that, if the Committee of Creditors opts to appoint two valuers, they must document the reasons for this decision before the resolution professional proceeds with the appointments. This will decrease CIRP costs and expedite the process for smaller entities.To prevent delays in the appointment of authorised representatives (AR) for creditors, the IBBI, also proposed to allow the interim resolution professional to enable the AR to participate in the Committee of Creditors meetings immediately after an application for their appointment is submitted to the adjudicating authority.The discussion paper also addressed the issue of release of guarantees in the resolution plan, the board proposes that such a proposal submitted by the applicant will not extinguish the rights of creditors to proceed against guarantors and enforce realisation of guarantees governed through various agreements.(With inputs from PTI)
sekar nallalu Cryptocurrency,Economy and Policy,News IBBI Proposes CIRP Regulation Changes; Seeks Stakeholder Feedback by July 10
Related Posts
The 5 Affordable Crypto Coins Under $1 Set for Potential 5x Bullish Rally
While many new coins find it difficult to compete in the crypto market, Angry Pepe Fork came prepared. Angry Pepe[...]
Cozy Texas Escape: Luxury Meets Savings with Tech-Powered Efficiency – Travel And Tour World
Texas Bed and Breakfast Leverages AI for Guest Discounts In a pioneering move, a top-rated bed and breakfast in Texas[...]
Kraken v CertiK: Who’s in the right after $3m exploit saga?
Kraken argues that CertiK was excessive — but the cybersecurity firm insists large-scale withdrawals were necessary to ascertain the scale[...]